Opinion · Nylaw New York

IN RE HENRY MORRIS, 260 N.Y. 562 (1932)

In the Matter of HENRY MORRIS, INC., Appellant, v. Dep’t OFHEALTH OF THE CITY OF N.Y., Respondent., 184 N.E. 93 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1932-10-11
Topic: general

IN RE HENRY MORRIS, 260 N.Y. 562 (1932) 184 N.E. 93 In the Matter of HENRY MORRIS, INC., Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted October 3, 1932 Decided October 11, 1932 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel (Arthur H. Kerns of counsel), for motion.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed IN RE HENRY MORRIS, 260 N.Y. 562 (1932). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

IN RE HENRY MORRIS,260 N.Y. 562(1932)

184 N.E. 93

In the Matter of HENRY MORRIS, INC., Appellant,v.THE DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted October 3, 1932

Decided October 11, 1932

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel(Arthur H. Kernsof counsel), for motion.Max Rothenberg,opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless the appellant files the record within ten days and pays ten dollars costs, in which event the motion is denied.