Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Ciccolini v. Vocafilm Corp. of America

Ciccolini v. Vocafilm Corp. of Am., 253 N.Y. 588 (New York Court of Appeals 1930)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1930-05-06
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The Appellate Division had authority to reverse the judgment as a matter of discretion. It did not exercise that power, however, but reversed as a matter of law. No error of law was involved. We are, therefore, compelled to reverse.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ciccolini v. Vocafilm Corp. of America. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
Per Curiam.

The Appellate Division had authority to reverse the judgment as a matter of discretion. It did not exercise that power, however, but reversed as a matter of law. No error of law was involved. We are, therefore, compelled to reverse. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Cardozo, Ch. J. Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.