Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company
McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Co., 251 N.Y. 507 (New York Court of Appeals 1929)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1929-05-28
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of McNamara v. Leipzig (227 N. Y. 291); Matter of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of McNamara v. Leipzig (227 N. Y. 291); Matter of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co. (229 N. Y. 97); Braxton v. *508 Mendelson (233 N. Y. 122); Charles v. Barrett (233 N. Y. 127); Meade v. Motor Haulage Co., Inc. (233 N. Y. 527); Cattini v. American Railway Express Co. (234 N. Y. 585); Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contracting Co.,Inc. (245 N. Y. 66).
Caedozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, etc.