Opinion · Nylaw New York

BUFFINGTON v. BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD, 249 N.Y. 514 (1928)

AUGUSTUS J. BUFFINGTON, as Adm’r, Adm’x of the Est. of EARL A.BUFFINGTON, Deceased, Appellants, v. Bos. & Me. R.R., Respondent., 164 N.E. 566 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1928)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1928-10-09
Topic: general

BUFFINGTON v. BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD, 249 N.Y. 514 (1928) 164 N.E. 566 AUGUSTUS J. BUFFINGTON, as Administrator of the Estate of EARL A.BUFFINGTON, Deceased, Appellants, v. BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 1, 1928 Decided October 9, 1928 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department. Jarvis P.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BUFFINGTON v. BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD, 249 N.Y. 514 (1928). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BUFFINGTONv.BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD,249 N.Y. 514(1928)

164 N.E. 566

AUGUSTUS J. BUFFINGTON, as Administrator of the Estate of EARL A.

BUFFINGTON, Deceased, Appellants,v.BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 1, 1928

Decided October 9, 1928

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Jarvis P. O'Brienfor motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.