Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky
Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky, 242 N.Y. 547 (New York Court of Appeals 1926)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1926-03-30
- Topic
- general
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Cardozo, J.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 16 opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Cardozo, J.