Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc.

242 N.Y. 497

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1926-01-22
Topic
general

Order affirmed, with costs against State Industrial Board, on ground that section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law does not permit an award to the employee for medical treatment, etc., furnished by the employer. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matter of Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
15 opinions

Order affirmed, with costs against State Industrial Board, on ground that section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law does not permit an award to the employee for medical treatment, etc., furnished by the employer.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.