Opinion · Nylaw New York

NAHME v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 224 N.Y. 731 (1918)

ALMA NAHME, Respondent, v. CITY OF N.Y., Appellant., 121 N.E. 890 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1918)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1918-01-01
Topic: general

NAHME v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 224 N.Y. 731 (1918) 121 N.E. 890 ALMA NAHME, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued November 19, 1918 Decided December 3, 1918 William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley of counsel), for appellant. Max Shlivek for respondent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed NAHME v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 224 N.Y. 731 (1918). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

NAHMEv. THE CITY OF NEW YORK,224 N.Y. 731(1918)

121 N.E. 890

ALMA NAHME, Respondent,v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 19, 1918

Decided December 3, 1918

Page 732

William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel(Terence Farleyof counsel), for appellant.Max Shlivekfor respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: CUDDEBACK, J.