Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Justice v. Carolina Central Railroad

96 N.C. 412

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1887-02-05
Topic
general

Davis, J. The defendant appellee moves the Court to affirm the judgment rendered in the Court below, upon the ground that no exceptions were taken and no errors assigned for consideration and review by this Court. No errors are pointed out or assigned in the record, and upon a careful examination we can find none. We call the attention of the profession to the suggestion of Merrimon, Judge, in the case of Lytle v. Lytle, 94 N.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Justice v. Carolina Central Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Davis, J.

The defendant appellee moves the Court to affirm the judgment rendered in the Court below, upon the ground that no exceptions were taken and no errors assigned for consideration and review by this Court.

No errors are pointed out or assigned in the record, and upon a careful examination we can find none.

We call the attention of the profession to the suggestion of Merrimon, Judge, in the case of Lytle v. Lytle, 94 N. C., 523, in regard to appeals, and to rule 7, to be found in 92 N. C., 847.

In this case the judgment below must be affirmed. Let this be certified.

Affirmed.