Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
STATE v. HADDOCK, 9 N.C. 461 (1823)
9 N.C. 461
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1823-01-01
- Topic
- general
STATE v. HADDOCK, 9 N.C. 461 (1823) STATE v. HADDOCK. — From Columbus.Supreme Court of North Carolina June Term, 1823. An indictment containing in its caption a statement of the term in these words, "Fall Term, 1822," and in the body of the indictment charging the time in these words, "on the first day of August, in the present year," was held good. INDICTMENT for assault, with intent to kill.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. HADDOCK, 9 N.C. 461 (1823). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATEv. HADDOCK,9 N.C. 461(1823)
STATE v. HADDOCK. — From Columbus.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
June Term, 1823.
SUPERIOR COURT OF LAW, FALL TERM, 1822.
The jurors for the State upon their oath present, that John Haddock, late of Columbus, on the first day of August, in the present year, with force and arms, etc.
After conviction it was moved in arrest that the time when the offense was committed was not laid in the indictment with sufficient certainty.
Judgment was arrested, and the State appealed.
PER CURIAM. Reversed.Cited: S. v. Lane,26 N.C. 121.Page 262
(465)
IN EQUITY