Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Whitley

88 N.C. 691

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1883-02-05
Topic
general

Ruffin, J. Without going beyond the first exception, the court thinks the defendant clearly entitled to have his cause tried by another jury. A tales-juror was called and challenged upon the ground that be had not paid his tax for the preceding year. The non-payment was admitted, but the court held it not to be a good cause of challenge, and the defendant excepted. It is needless to argue the point, as it was distinctly presented and determined in Lee v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Whitley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
STATEv. WHITLEY,88 N.C. 691(1883)
STATE v. H. S. WHITLEY.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
(February Term, 1883.)
A tales-juror is required to possess the same qualifications as one of the regular panel, with the additional one of being a freeholder.

(Leev.Lee,71 N.C. 139, cited and approved).
INDICTMENT for perjury, removed from Wilson, and tried at Fall Term, 1881, of EDGECOMBE Superior Court, beforeGilmer, J.

Verdict of guilty; judgment; appeal by defendant.
Attorney-General, for the State.Messrs. Reade, Busbee Busbee, for defendant.
RUFFIN, J.
Without going beyond the first exception, the court thinks the defendant clearly entitled to have his cause tried by another jury.

A tales-juror was called and challenged upon the ground that he had not paid his tax for the preceding year. The non-payment was admitted, but the court held it not to be a good cause of challenge, and the defendant excepted.

It is needless to argue the point, as it was distinctly presented and determined inLeev.Lee,71 N.C. 139, where it was held, that, upon a proper construction of the statutes upon the subject (Bat. Rev., ch. 17, § 229 a, and page 860 —Addenda to Code)Page 692a tales-juror is required to possess the same qualifications as one of the regular panel, with the additional one of being a freeholder; and in Thompon on Juries, § 100, it is said that talesmen must possess the statutory qualification of regular jurors.

But, in the absence of any authority, it would seem impossible, upon reflection, to avoid coming to the same conclusion, since, in prescribing a new and specific qualification for tales-jurors, it cannot be supposed that the legislature intended to dispense with the old safe guards. As suggested by counsel, the very term, "tales-jurors," imports that they must besuchas are qualified.

We have not considered the other exceptions, as they relate to matters that are not likely to occur upon another trial, except the one in reference to the variance between the proofs and the full matter alleged in the indictment — and this, without undertaking to decide it, we venture to say, it would be safest to remove by sending another bill.

For the error in disallowing the challenge to the juror, there must be another trial.

Error.Venire de novo.