Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. . Hinson
State v. . Hinson, 82 N.C. 540 (N.C. 1880)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1880-01-05
- Topic
- general
Smith, C. J. The defendant is indicted for carrying concealed about his person a pistol in violation of the act of March 5th, 1879, and on the trial was found guilty. On inspecting the record it appears that no final judgment has been rendered, and therefore as has been repeatedly held no appeal lies. It is only in civil causes that appeals from in *541 terlocutory orders are allowed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Hinson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
STATEv. HINSON,82 N.C. 540(1880)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal — Practice.
No appeal lies from an interlocutory order in a criminal action.
(State v. Bailey,65 N.C. 426;State v. Wiseman,68 N.C. 203;State v.Keeter,80 N.C. 472, cited and approved.)
INDICTMENT for a Misdemeanor tried at Fall Term, 1879, of Anson Superior Court, beforeSeymour, J.
The indictment is drawn under the act of 1879, ch. 127, for carrying a concealed weapon. The state proved that the defendant was seen on the track of the Carolina Central railroad pointing a pistol at a train leaving Lilesville, and that he discharged the same. Defendant objected, for that, there was no evidence of concealment, exception overruled, verdict of guilty, (but no final judgment pronounced thereon) and the defendant appealed.
Attorney General, for the State.Messrs. G. V. StrongandGray Stamps, for the defendant.
SMITH, C. J.
The defendant is indicted for carrying concealed about his person a pistol in violation of the act of March 5th, 1879, and on the trial was found guilty. On inspecting the record it appears that no final judgment has been rendered, and therefore as has been repeatedly held no appeal lies. It is only in civil causes that appeals fromPage 541interlocutory orders are allowed.State v. Bailey,65 N.C. 426;State v.Wiseman,68 N.C. 203;State v. Keeter,80 N.C. 472. The appeal must therefore be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
PER CURIAM Appeal dismissed.