Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. . Burns
State v. . Burns, 80 N.C. 376 (N.C. 1879)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1879-01-05
- Topic
- general
Ashe, J. There were some exceptions taken by the defendant on the trial below, but it is only necessary to notice that taken to the form of the indictment. The bill of indictment does not charge that the lien was in force when the bale of cotton was disposed o£ nor to whom it was sold. For- these reasons' the bill is fatally defective, and the judgment below must be arrested. State v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Burns. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
STATEv. BURNS,80 N.C. 376(1879)
STATE v. TONEY BURNS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
(January Term, 1879.)
An indictment for disposing of mortgaged property under the act of 1873-'74, ch. 31, is fatally defective, if it fails to set forth that the lien was in force at the time of sale, the party to whom sold, and the manner of disposition.
(Statev.Pickens,79 N.C. 652, cited and approved.)
The bill of indictment does not charge that the lien was in force when the bale of cotton was disposed of, nor to whom it was sold. For these reasons the bill is fatally defective, and the judgment below must be arrested.Statev.Pickens,79 N.C. 652.
There is error. Let this be certified to the superior court of Wake county that the defendant may be discharged.
PER CURIAM. Error.Page 377