Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Mabry v. . Erwin

78 N.C. 45

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1878-01-05
Topic
general

An irregular judgment, that is to say, a judgment rendered contrary to the course and practice of the court, may be set aside at any time, even after the term of the court which rendered it. This was not controverted. And the judgment in this case being rendered by default final upon a former judgment, it was supposed by his Honor to be irregular, because contrary to the provision of C. C. P., (46) sec. 217.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mabry v. . Erwin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
MABRYv. ERWIN,78 N.C. 45(1878)
JOSEPH A. MABRY v. MARCUS ERWIN AND OTHERS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
(January Term, 1878.)
Practice — Judgment by Default — Former Judgment.

1. A judgment by default rendered by the Superior Court in term-time in an action upon a former judgment or decree is regular without proof of such judgment or decree being made before the clerk; section 218 of The Code is suspended by the act suspending The Code. Bat. Rev., ch. 18.

2. A motion made after the expiration of a year to set aside a judgment under C. C. P., sec. 132, cannot be allowed.
MOTION to set aside a judgment, heard at Fall Term, 1877, of BUNCOMBE, beforeSchenck, J.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment final by default against the defendants at a former term of said court, in an action based upon a former judgment or decree of the late court of equity. His Honor allowed the motion upon the ground that the judgment was irregular, being of opinion that the plaintiff was not entitled to said judgment by default without some proof of the former decree made to the clerk as provided in C. C. P., sec. 217. From which ruling the plaintiff appealed.
J. H. Merrimon for plaintiff.Battle Mordecai for defendants.
READE, J.
An irregular judgment, that is to say, a judgment rendered contrary to the course and practice of the court, may be set aside at any time, even after the term of the court which rendered it. This was not controverted. And the judgment in this case being rendered by default final upon a former judgment, it was supposed by his Honor to be irregular, because contrary to the provision of C. C. P., (46) sec. 217.

His Honor was, however, mistaken in supposing that that section of The Code governed the practice in that case, because it had been suspended by the subsequent statute, Bat. Rev., ch. 18, suspending The Code. And the judgment was not rendered by the clerk under C. C. P., sec. 217, but by the court in term-time, and was in all respects regular. It was error, therefore, to set it aside.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

Note — In a case between the same parties at the same term of said court, beforeSchenck, J., the motion was denied upon the ground state in the opinion, as follows:
READE, J.
An irregular judgment may be set aside at any time, but a regular judgment cannot be set aside after the term of the court whichPage 32rendered it. So the law stood before C. C. P., and so it stands now, except that under C. C. P., sec. 133, even a regular judgment may be set aside for mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect of the party against whom it is rendered, if motion is made within on year.

More than a year had expired before the motion was made in this case, and, therefore, it cannot be allowed.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.Cited: Askew v. Capehart,79 N.C. 19;Monroe v. Whitted, ib., 510;University v. Lassiter,83 N.C. 42;Mabry v. Henry, ib., 299;McLean v.McLean,84 N.C. 369;Stradley v. King, ib., 639;Wynne v. Prairie,86 N.C. 77;Roger v. Moore, ib., 88;Parker v. Bledsoe,87 N.C. 244;Cook v. Moore,100 N.C. 295.

(47)