Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Moore v. . Hobbs
77 N.C. 65
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1877-06-05
- Topic
- general
Read®, J. The causes assigned for demurrer do not ap--pear in the complaint, and therefore can be taken advantage of only by answer. The case will be remanded to the end that the defendants-may answer, and on failure to do which there should be-judgment for plaintiff. We call attention to the fact that C. C.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moore v. . Hobbs. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
MOOREv. HOBBS,77 N.C. 65(1877)
WILLIAM A. MOORE v. MOSES HOBBS AND ABRAM T. BUSH.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
(June Term, 1877.)
If the cause assigned for demurrer does not appear in the complaint, it can be taken advantage of only by answer.
The case will be remanded, to the end that the defendants may answer, and on failure to do which there should be judgment for plaintiff.
We call attention to the fact that C. C. P., sec. 91, requires that the "complaint" should contain "a plain and concise statement of the facts constituting the cause of action." It may be that the complaint in this case is at fault in that particular. If so, it may be amended by leave.
There was no error in overruling the demurrer, but there was error in giving judgment for the demand without allowing an answer. Bat. Rev., ch. 17, sec. 131.
Case remanded. Each party will pay his own costs in this Court.
PER CURIAM. Remanded.Cited: S. c.,79 N.C. 535;Womble v. Leach,83 N.C. 86;Dills v.Hampton,92 N.C. 569;Kiff v. Weaver,94 N.C. 278;Hornthal v. Burwell,109 N.C. 18;Burton v. Mfg. Co.,132 N.C. 19;Allred v. Smith,135 N.C. 457.
(67)