Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

DULA et al. YOUNG and CLARK, Adm'rs., 73 N.C. 69 (1875)

SARAH H. DULA & another v. ZEPHANIAH YOUNG & C. W.CLARK, Adm'r., c., 73 N.C. 69 (N.C. 1875)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1875-01-01
Topic: general

DULA et al. YOUNG and CLARK, Adm'rs., 73 N.C. 69 (1875) SARAH H. DULA and another v. ZEPHANIAH YOUNG and C. W.CLARK, Adm'r., c.Supreme Court of North Carolina June Term, 1875.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DULA et al. YOUNG and CLARK, Adm'rs., 73 N.C. 69 (1875). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DULAet al. YOUNG and CLARK, Adm'rs.,73 N.C. 69(1875)

SARAH H. DULA and anotherv. ZEPHANIAH YOUNG and C. W.

CLARK, Adm'r., c.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

June Term, 1875.

(Dulav.Young,70 N.C. 450, affirmed.

PETITION to re-hear this case, which was decided in this Court at January Term, 1874.

The case is fully reported in70 N.C. 450.

READE, J.

The learned argument of the counsel for the petitioner failed to satisfy us that we had mistaken any important fact, or misapplied any principle of law or equity. We must therefore adhere to our decision, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of our learned brother, Justice Settle.

There will be judgment against the petitioner for cost.

PER CURIAM. Judgment accordingly.Page 70