Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Harper

71 N.C. 314

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1874-06-05
Topic
general

Reade, J. The facts in this case are the same as in State v. Parrott, et. al., at this term, and the decision is the same and for the same reasons. Let the decision in this and the opinion in that, be certified as the decision and opinion in this case, to the end that the Court below may proceed to judgment, discharging the defendants as upon a verdict of not guilty. Per Curiam.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. . Harper. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
STATEv. HARPER,71 N.C. 314(1874)
STATE v. JAMES W. HARPER AND OTHERS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
(June Term, 1874.)
(See Syllabus in the case ofState v. Parrottand others, in which both facts and the points decided are the same as in this case.)
INDICTMENT for trespass in tearing down a portion of a Railroad bridge, tried beforeClarke, J., at the Spring Term, 1874, of LENOIR Superior Court.
The facts, like those of the next preceding case, found by the special verdict of the jury, are the same as those in theState v. Parrott, ante, 311.

Upon the special verdict his Honor held that the defendants were not guilty, whereupon the State appealed.
Attorney General Hargrove, Pou, Seymour and Lehman, for theState.Smith Strong, for the defendants.Page 253
READE, J.
The facts in this case are the same as inState v. Parrott, ante, 311, at this term, and the decision is the same and for the same reasons.

Let the decision in this and the opinion in that, be certified as the decision and opinion in this case, to the end that the Court below may proceed to judgment, discharging the defendants as upon a verdict of not guilty.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.Cited: Comrs. v. Lumber Co.,116 N.C. 742.

(315)