Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

INSURANCE CO. v. BISHOP, 71 N.C. 303 (1874)

N.C. Mut. LIFE Ins. C. v. GEORGE BISHOP., 71 N.C. 303 (N.C. 1874)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1874-01-01
Topic: general

INSURANCE CO. v. BISHOP, 71 N.C. 303 (1874) N.C. MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE C. v. GEORGE BISHOP.Supreme Court of North Carolina (June Term, 1874.) (See Syllabus of the preceding case, Pescud v. Hawkins.) This was a CIVIL ACTION brought to recover a promissory note, tried before Tourgee, J., at the Special (January) Term, 1874, of WAKE Superior Court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed INSURANCE CO. v. BISHOP, 71 N.C. 303 (1874). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

INSURANCE CO.v. BISHOP,71 N.C. 303(1874)

N.C. MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE C. v. GEORGE BISHOP.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

(June Term, 1874.)

(See Syllabus of the preceding case,Pescud v. Hawkins.)

This was a CIVIL ACTION brought to recover a promissory note, tried beforeTourgee, J., at the Special (January) Term, 1874, of WAKE Superior Court.

The note alleged by the plaintiff corporation to be due and made by defendant was for $198.24, dated 1st day of February, 1863. On the trial below, the same motions were made and the same proceedings had as in the preceding case ofPescud v. Hawkins.

The plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the Court dismissing the complaint.

Fowle, Haywood and Battle Son, for appellant.Fuller Ashe, contra.

BYNUM, J.

The facts and the questions of law, presented by this case, are precisely similar to those set forth in the case ofPescud v. Hawkins, decided at this term of the Supreme Court. For the reasons there given which apply to and govern this case, there was error in the judgment below, and the judgment is reversed here.

PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed.Page 245

(304)