Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Jones v. Harrelson & Smith Contractors, LLC

362 N.C. 226

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
2008-03-07
Topic
general

*227 PER CURIAM. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this case is remanded to that court for reconsideration in light of Dogwood Development & Management Co. v. White Oak Transport Co., 362 N.C. 191,-S.E.2d-(2008), and State v. Hart, 361 N.C. 309, 644 S.E.2d 201 (2007). REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jones v. Harrelson & Smith Contractors, LLC. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
JONES v. HARRELSON AND SMITH,362 N.C. 226(2008)
DARVELLA JONES v. HARRELSON AND SMITH CONTRACTORS, LLC, A NORTH CAROLINA
CORPORATION, AND RODNEY S. TURNER D/B/A RODNEY S. TURNER HOUSEMOVERS.
No. 36A07.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Filed March 7, 2008.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,180 N.C. App. 478,638 S.E.2d 222(2006), dismissing plaintiff's appeal from a judgment entered on 10 May 2005 by Judge Jerry Braswell in Superior Court, Pamlico County. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 December 2007.
Smith Moore LLP, by J. Donald Cowan, Jr. and Elizabeth Brooks Scherer,for plaintiff-appellant.Hopf Higley, P.A., by Donald S. Higley, II, for defendant-appelleeHarrelson and Smith Contractors, LLC.Troutman Sanders, LLP, by Hannah G. Styron and D. Martin Warf, forNorth Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys; and Elliot PishkoMorgan, P.A., by David C. Pishko, for North Carolina Academy of TrialLawyers, amid curiae.Page 227
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this case is remanded to that court for reconsideration in light ofDogwoodDevelopment Management Co. v. White Oak Transport Co.,362 N.C. 191,___ S.E.2d ___(2008) (303A07), andState v. Hart,361 N.C. 309,644 S.E.2d 201(2007).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.