Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 359 N.C. 403 (N.C. 2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2005-04-07
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
610 S.E.2d 374 (2005) 359 N.C. 403 John ALEXANDER, Employee v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Employer, American Home Assurance Company, Carrier. No. 588A04. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 7, 2005.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
John ALEXANDER, Employee
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., Employer,
American Home Assurance Company, Carrier.
No. 588A04.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
April 7, 2005.Brumbaugh, Mu & King, P.A., Jacksonville, by Nicole D. Wray and Charles R. Hassell Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.
Young Moore and Henderson P.A., Raleigh, by Zachary C. Bolen and Dawn Dillon Raynor, for defendant-appellees.
Kathleen Shannon Glancy, Wilmington, Counsel for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.