Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
In re McMillon
354 N.C. 218
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2001-10-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that "[w]here there is competent evidence to support the court's findings, the admission of incompetent evidence is not prejudicial"
- stating that "[w]illfulness is established when the respondent had the ability to show reasonable progress, but was unwilling to make the effort"
- "[U]nder such circumstances, the trial court need not make detailed findings as to the amount that would be `reasonable' to expect from respondent."
- "In a bench trial, the court is presumed to disregard incompetent evidence."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re McMillon. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 54 opinions
Petition by respondent (Charles McMillon) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.