Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Pittman v. International Paper Co.
351 N.C. 42
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1999-10-08
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
How later courts describe this case
- stating that “in exercising its discretion to receive additional evidence, the Commission should consider all the circumstances of the case, including the delay involved in taking additional evidence, and should not encourage a lack of pre-deposition preparation by counsel or witnesses”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pittman v. International Paper Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
519 S.E.2d 524 (1999) 351 N.C. 42
James R. PITTMAN, Employee,
No. 86A99.
James R. PITTMAN, Employee,
v.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, Employer, Wausau Insurance Company, Carrier.
No. 86A99.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
October 8, 1999.*525 Gillespie & Higgins, by James B. Gillespie, Jr., Wilmington, for plaintiff-appellee.
Teague, Campbell, Dennis & Gorham, L.L.P., by Gregory M. Willis, Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.