Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 350 N.C. 592 (1999)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 350 N.C. 592 (1999), 350 N.C. 592 (N.C. 1999)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1999-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 350 N.C. 592 (1999)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1999 DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW UNDER G.S. 7A-31 AMERICAN MFRS. MUT. INS. CO. v. HAGLER No. 80P99 Case below: 132 N.C.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 350 N.C. 592 (1999). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,350 N.C. 592(1999)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1999
AMERICAN MFRS. MUT. INS. CO. v. HAGLER
No. 80P99
Case below: 132 N.C. App. (2 February 1999)
Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 June 1999.
BISHOP v. BISHOP
No. 89P99
Case below: 132 N.C. App. (19 January 1999)
Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 June 1999.
BRAME v. SHARPE
No. 216P99
Case below: 132 N.C. App. (6 April 1999)
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 24 June 1999.
BROOKS v. SOUTHERN NAT'L CORP.
No. 497P98
Case below:131 N.C. App. 80
Motion by defendants to dismiss appeal by plaintiff pursuant to G.S.7A-30(substantial constitutional question) allowed 24 June 1999. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 24 June 1999. Justice Martin recused.
C.C. J. ENTERS., INC. v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE
No. 184P99
Case below: 132 N.C. App. (16 March 1999)
Petition by respondent (City of Asheville) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31allowed 24 June 1999. Petition by intervenor (Jackson Park/Woolsey) for writ of supersedeas allowed 24 June 1999. Petition by intervenor (Jackson Park/Woolsey) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31allowed 24 June 1999.Page 593