Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 349 N.C. 354 (1998)

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 349 N.C. 354 (1998), 349 N.C. 354 (N.C. 1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1998-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 349 N.C. 354 (1998)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1998 CHILTON v. CITY OF EDEN No. 423P98 Case below: 130 N.C. App. 610 (18 August 1998) Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998. CITY OF GREENVILLE v. HAYWOOD No. 407P98 Case below: 130 N.C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 349 N.C. 354 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,349 N.C. 354(1998)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1998
CHILTON v. CITY OF EDEN

No. 423P98

Case below:130 N.C. App. 610(18 August 1998)

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 5 November 1998.

CITY OF GREENVILLE v. HAYWOOD

No. 407P98

Case below:130 N.C. App. 271(21 July 1998)

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 3 December 1998.

CONDELLONE v. CONDELLONE

No. 344P98

Case below:129 N.C. App. 675(16 June 1998)

Petition by defendant (Peter Condellone) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 5 November 1998.

CONLEY v. EMERALD ISLE REALTY, INC.

No. 358PA98

Case below:130 N.C. App. 309(21 July 1998)

Petition by defendants (Ingrams) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31allowed 5 November 1998. Petition by defendant (Emerald Isle) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31allowed 5 November 1998.Page 355