Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 339 N.C. 621 (1995)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 339 N.C. 621 (1995), 339 N.C. 621 (N.C. 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1995-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 339 N.C. 621 (1995)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1995 DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW UNDER G.S. 7A-31 TRIPLE E ASSOCIATES v. TOWN OF MATTHEWS No. 593P94 Case below: 116 N.C. App. 738 Petition by respondent for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31 denied 9 February 1995. TRULL v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK No. 19P95 Case below: 117 N.C.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 339 N.C. 621 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,339 N.C. 621(1995)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1995
TRIPLE E ASSOCIATES v. TOWN OF MATTHEWS
No. 593P94
Case below:116 N.C. App. 738
Petition by respondent for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 9 February 1995.
TRULL v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK
No. 19P95
Case below:117 N.C. App. 220
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 9 February 1995.