Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dublin v. UCR, Inc.
337 N.C. 800
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1994-10-05
- Topic
- intellectual-property-and-technology
Motion by plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal by defendant (U-Can Rent, Inc. II) and third-party defendant (Voyager Property and Casualty Ins. Co.) for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1994. Petitions by defendant (U-Can Rent, Inc. II) and third-party defendant (Voyager Property and Casualty Ins.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dublin v. UCR, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Motion by plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal by defendant (U-Can Rent, Inc. II) and third-party defendant (Voyager Property and Casualty Ins. Co.) for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1994. Petitions by defendant (U-Can Rent, Inc. II) and third-party defendant (Voyager Property and Casualty Ins. Co.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1994.