Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 329 N.C. 275 (1991)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 329 N.C. 275 (1991), 329 N.C. 275 (N.C. 1991)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1991-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 329 N.C. 275 (1991)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1991 STATE v. ROBERTSON No. 34P91 Case below: 101 N.C. App. 243 Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 June 1991. STATE v. RODMAN No. 126P91 Case below: 101 N.C.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 329 N.C. 275 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,329 N.C. 275(1991)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1991
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 12 June 1991.
STATE v. RODMAN No. 126P91 Case below:101 N.C. App. 576
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 12 June 1991.
STATE v. TAYLOR No. 205P91 Case below:102 N.C. App. 354
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 12 June 1991.
STATE v. WHITE No. 159P91 Case below:101 N.C. App. 593
Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 June 1991. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 12 June 1991.
STATE v. WILLIAMS No. 204P91 Case below:102 N.C. App. 354
Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 June 1991. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 12 June 1991.Page 276