Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Wilson v. McLeod Oil Co.
Wilson v. McLeod Oil Co., 325 N.C. 714 (N.C. 1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1989-12-07
- Topic
- general
Petition by plaintiffs and intervenor plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 7 December 1989. Petitions by defendants Estate of Riggan, McLeod Oil Co., Loren A. Tompkins and Adrian Simmons for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 7 December 1989.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wilson v. McLeod Oil Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Petition by plaintiffs and intervenor plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 7 December 1989. Petitions by defendants Estate of Riggan, McLeod Oil Co., Loren A. Tompkins and Adrian Simmons for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 7 December 1989.