Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 324 N.C. 333 (1989)

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 324 N.C. 333 (1989), 324 N.C. 333 (N.C. 1989)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1989-01-01
Topic: general

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 324 N.C. 333 (1989)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1989 BARTLETT v. INGLES MARKETS, INC. No. 95P89. Case below: 92 N.C. App. 598.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 324 N.C. 333 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,324 N.C. 333(1989)

Supreme Court of North Carolina

1989

BARTLETT v. INGLES MARKETS, INC. No. 95P89. Case below:92 N.C. App. 598.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 5 April 1989.

BATTEN v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION No. 76PA89. Case below:92 N.C. App. 595.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31allowed 5 April 1989.

BOTTOMLEY v. BOTTOMLEY No. 536P88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 586.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 5 April 1989.

BUMGARNER v. TOMBLIN No. 94P89. Case below:92 N.C. App. 571.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 5 April 1989.

BURNS v. BURNS No. 66P89. Case below:92 N.C. App. 114.

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 April 1989.Page 334