Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Hartman v. Hartman
319 N.C. 396
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1987-04-07
- Topic
- bankruptcy
354 S.E.2d 239 (1987) 319 N.C. 396 Raleigh Wilbur HARTMAN v. Elsie H. HARTMAN. No. 528A86. Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hartman v. Hartman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
354 S.E.2d 239 (1987) 319 N.C. 396
Raleigh Wilbur HARTMAN
No. 528A86.
Raleigh Wilbur HARTMAN
v.
Elsie H. HARTMAN.
No. 528A86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
April 7, 1987.Morrow, Long and Black by John F. Morrow and Clifton R. Long, Jr., Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.
Petree, Stockton & Robinson by W. Thompson Comerford, Jr. and Jane C. Jackson, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WEBB and WHICHARD, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.