Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 301 N.C. 96 (1980)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 301 N.C. 96 (1980), 301 N.C. 96 (N.C. 1980)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1980-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 301 N.C. 96 (1980)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1980 STANSFIELD v. MAHOWSKY No. 284 PC Case below: 46 N.C. App. 829 Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31 denied 15 August 1980. STATE v. BIDDIX No. 266 PC Case below: 46 N.C.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 301 N.C. 96 (1980). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,301 N.C. 96(1980)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1980
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 15 August 1980.
STATE v. BIDDIX No. 266 PC Case below:46 N.C. App. 606
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 15 August 1980.
STATE v. CLINDING No. 315 PC Case below:47 N.C. App. 374
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 15 August 1980.
STATE v. COLE No. 242 PC Case below:46 N.C. App. 592
Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 15 August 1980. Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 15 August 1980.
STATE v. COOLEY No. 382 PC Case below:47 N.C. App. 376
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 16 September 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 16 September 1980.Page 97