Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 301 N.C. 90 (1980)

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 301 N.C. 90 (1980), 301 N.C. 90 (N.C. 1980)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1980-01-01
Topic: general

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 301 N.C. 90 (1980)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1980 INDUSTRIES, INC. v. THARPE No. 399 PC Case below: 47 N.C. App. 754 Petition by defendant Barker for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980. IN RE CALHOUN No. 363 PC Case below: 47 N.C. App. 472 Petition by caveator for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31 denied 16 September 1980.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 301 N.C. 90 (1980). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,301 N.C. 90(1980)

Supreme Court of North Carolina

1980

INDUSTRIES, INC. v. THARPE No. 399 PC Case below:47 N.C. App. 754

Petition by defendant Barker for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 16 September 1980.

IN RE CALHOUN No. 363 PC Case below:47 N.C. App. 472

Petition by caveator for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 16 September 1980.

IN RE FORECLOSURE OF BURGESS No. 94 Case below:47 N.C. App. 599

Motion of petitioner to dismiss appeal of respondents for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 15 August 1980.

IN RE FORECLOSURE OF SUTTON INVESTMENTS No. 277 PC Case below:46 N.C. App. 654

Petition by Sutton Investments for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 15 August 1980. Motion of appellee to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 15 August 1980.

IN RE KAPOOR No. 389 PC No. 135 (Fall Term) Case below:47 N.C. App. 500

Petition by Trust Company for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31allowed 16 September 1980.Page 91