Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
SLEDGE v. POPE, 3 N.C. 402 (1806)
SLEDGE v. POPE., 3 N.C. 402 (Superior Court of North Carolina 1806)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1806-01-01
- Topic
- general
SLEDGE v. POPE, 3 N.C. 402 (1806) SLEDGE v. POPE.Superior Court of North Carolina (Spring Riding, 1806.) Previous threats may be given in evidence to increase damages, in an action of assault and battery. TAYLOR, J. (after argument): In this action for an assault and battery the plaintiff proposes to give in evidence threats which the defendant made in the presence of the plaintiff, to be executed at a future day.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed SLEDGE v. POPE, 3 N.C. 402 (1806). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
SLEDGEv. POPE,3 N.C. 402(1806)
Superior Court of North Carolina
Previous threats may be given in evidence to increase damages, in an action of assault and battery.
TAYLOR, J. (after argument):
In this action for an assault and battery the plaintiff proposes to give in evidence threats which the defendant made in the presence of the plaintiff, to be executed at a future day. Counsel for the defendant opposes the evidence on the (403) ground of a former decision made in this Court, in the case ofBary v. Ingles, which excluded testimony of a provocation given to the defendant some months before the assault by the plaintiff, by newspaper publications. That decision proceeded on the principle that the passions of men should cool and subside in some reasonable time, and would not allow the continuance of them, without a reasonable provocation, to be taken as a mitigation of an assault made at a distant time; but thatPage 354principle is not opposed to the evidence now offered, for the object of it is to enhance the damages, because the defendant still kept alive his resentment after a sufficient time for it to cool. If an old provocation will not excuse a recent assault, a threat formerly made and recently executed, as it evinces an unreasonable continuance of heat, will induce an increase of damages on that account.
NOTE. — SeeCausey v. Auden,20 N.C. 246.Cited: Mills v. Carpenter,32 N.C. 301.