Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 291 N.C. 323 (1976)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 291 N.C. 323 (1976), 291 N.C. 323 (N.C. 1976)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1976-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 291 N.C. 323 (1976)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1976 BEASLEY-KELSO ASSOCIATES v. TENNEY No. 86 PC. Case below: 30 N.C. App. 708. Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31 denied 7 December 1976.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 291 N.C. 323 (1976). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,291 N.C. 323(1976)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1976
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 7 December 1976.
CONSTRUCTION CO. v. COAN No. 94 PC. Case below:30 N.C. App. 731.
Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 7 December 1976.
GUTHRIE v. RAY No. 79 PC. Case below:31 N.C. App. 142.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31allowed 7 December 1976.
HOMES, INC. v. GAITHER No. 105 PC. Case below:31 N.C. App. 118.
Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 7 December 1976.
MAZZUCCO v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS No. 104 PC. Case below:31 N.C. App. 47.
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 7 December 1976. Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 December 1976.Page 324