Opinion · Superior Court of North Carolina

Pearle v. . Folsom

Pearle v. . Folsom, 2 N.C. 413 (Superior Court of North Carolina 1796)

Type
Opinion
Court
Superior Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1796-10-05
Topic
general

Clearly, before the late act which has made some alteration, he was discharged only as to such creditors who had commenced their suits and had notice given them of the debtor's petition. See Burton v. Dickens, 7 N.C. 103; Howard v. Pasteur, ibid., 270;Jordan v. James, 10 N.C. 110.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pearle v. . Folsom. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Clearly, before the late act which has made some alteration, he was discharged only as to such creditors who had commenced their suits and had notice given them of the debtor's petition.

See Burton v. Dickens, 7 N.C. 103; Howard v. Pasteur, ibid., 270;Jordan v. James, 10 N.C. 110.