Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

In Re Trotter

In Re Trotter, 115 N.C. 193 (N.C. 1894)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1894-09-05
Topic
general

Pee Curiam : We have examined the authorities cited by counsel with much care, and after due consideration we conclude that his Honor erred in sustaining the action of the Clerk in refusing to accept the bond of Trotter upon the ground stated by him. It is not found that the said Trotter has been in default in any particular, except a failure to renew his bond, and this he offers to do in response to the notice served upon him. Reversed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Trotter. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
Pee Curiam :

We have examined the authorities cited by counsel with much care, and after due consideration we conclude that his Honor erred in sustaining the action of the Clerk in refusing to accept the bond of Trotter upon the ground stated by him. It is not found that the said Trotter has been in default in any particular, except a failure to renew his bond, and this he offers to do in response to the notice served upon him. Reversed.