Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

INGRAM v. HALL, 1 N.C. 69 (1795)

JOHN INGRAM, ASSIGNEE, ETC., v. JOHN HALL. — 1 Mart., 1., 1 N.C. 69 (Superior Court of North CarolinaFAYETTEVILLE 1795)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1795-01-01
Topic: general

INGRAM v. HALL, 1 N.C. 69 (1795) JOHN INGRAM, ASSIGNEE, ETC., v. JOHN HALL. — 1 Mart., 1.Superior Court of North CarolinaFAYETTEVILLE April Term, 1795. NOTE. — See this case reported at length in 2 N.C. 193, and see, also, the note thereto. As to the proof of attested deeds and other sealed instruments, see the note to Clements v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed INGRAM v. HALL, 1 N.C. 69 (1795). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

INGRAMv. HALL,1 N.C. 69(1795)

JOHN INGRAM, ASSIGNEE, ETC., v. JOHN HALL. — 1 Mart., 1.

Superior Court of North Carolina

FAYETTEVILLE

April Term, 1795.

NOTE. — See this case reported at length in2 N.C. 193, and see, also, the note thereto. As to the proof of attested deeds and other sealed instruments, see the note toClements v. Eason,2 N.C. 18, and the cases ofMcKinder v. Littlejohn,23 N.C. 66, andBlume v. Bowman,24 N.C. 338.