Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 87 N.C. App. 178 (1987)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 87 N.C. App. 178 (1987), 87 N.C. App. 178 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1987-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 87 N.C. App. 178 (1987)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 1 September 1987 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] STATE v. ALSTON Guilford No Error No. 8718SC185 (84CRS15289) (84CRS57048) STATE v. BASS Mecklenburg No Error No. 8726SC115 (86CRS17010) STATE v. BEST Person No Error No. 879SC60 (84CRS3414) STATE v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 87 N.C. App. 178 (1987). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,87 N.C. App. 178(1987)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 1 September 1987


STATE v. ALSTON Guilford No Error No. 8718SC185 (84CRS15289) (84CRS57048)

STATE v. BASS Mecklenburg No Error No. 8726SC115 (86CRS17010)

STATE v. BEST Person No Error No. 879SC60 (84CRS3414)

STATE v. JOHNSON Robeson No Error No. 8716SC252 (86CRS14478)

STATE v. LEWIS Pasquotank No Error No. 871SC68 (86CRS1601) (86CRS1602)

STATE v. LONG Davie Appeal Dismissed No. 8722SC245 (86CRS3504)

STATE v. LYLES Johnston No Error No. 8611SC875 (85CRS12873)

STATE v. PIPPIN Edgecombe No Error No. 877SC122 (86CRS1861)

STATE v. SANDERS Guilford No Error No. 8718SC101 (86CRS47607)

STATE v. SECHRIST Davidson No Error No. 8722SC195 (85CRS18320) (85CRS18321)

STATE v. SEVERINE Bladen Appeal Dismissed No. 8713SC284 (86CRS5358)

STATE v. WELTER Carteret Dismissed No. 873SC275 (86CRS4628) (86CRS4630)

STATE EX REL. UTILITIES Utilities Comm. Affirmed COMM. v. CARTER (EC-51, Sub 11) No. 8710UC72

UMSTEAD v. RODENHIZER Durham Vacated and No. 8614SC523 (82CVS281) Remanded

WILLIAMS v. JONES Guilford Affirmed No. 8718SC93 (84CVS6916)Page 179
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩