Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 74 N.C. App. 411 (1985)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 74 N.C. App. 411 (1985), 74 N.C. App. 411 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1985-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 74 N.C. App. 411 (1985)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 16 April 1985 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 16 APRIL 1985 BOWMAN v. BOWMAN Guilford Affirmed No. 8418DC740 (83CVD5707) BRESHEARS v. TURNER Durham Dismissed No. 8414SC352 (77SP246) DAWSON v. CHRISCOE Moore Affirmed No. 8420SC795 (82CVS95) IN RE WHITFIELD v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 74 N.C. App. 411 (1985). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,74 N.C. App. 411(1985)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 16 April 1985


FILED 16 APRIL 1985

BOWMAN v. BOWMAN Guilford Affirmed No. 8418DC740 (83CVD5707)

BRESHEARS v. TURNER Durham Dismissed No. 8414SC352 (77SP246)

DAWSON v. CHRISCOE Moore Affirmed No. 8420SC795 (82CVS95)

IN RE WHITFIELD v. Person No Error N.C. FARM BUREAU (81CVD372) No. 849DC558

LOVINGOOD v. FOX McDowell Affirmed No. 8429SC872 (83CVS510)

MADDOX v. GLASGOW Durham Affirmed No. 8414DC1143 (83CVD2611)

PLANT v. PLANT Alexander Dismissed No. 8422DC1140 (83CVD204)

SHIELDS v. SHIELDS Chatham Affirmed No. 8415SC914 (82CVS271)

STAR AUTOMOBILE v. Wake Vacated remanded SAAB-SCANIA (83CVS6049) with instructions No. 8410SC823

STATE v. BONHAM Forsyth No Error No. 8421SC895 (83CRS57329)

STATE v. BYRD Guilford Vacated remanded No. 8418SC655 (83CRS15595) for new hearing (83CRS15596) (83CRS15597) (83CRS15598) (83CRS15599)

STATE v. CASHWELL Davie Affirmed No. 8422SC902 (84CRS0766) Davidson (83CRS13416)

STATE v. DAVIS McDowell No Error No. 8429DC1151 (83CRS4799)

STATE v. GARNER Onslow No Error No. 844SC1012 (84CR322) (84CR323)Page 412
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩