Opinion · Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Cruse

State v. Cruse, 14 N.C. App. 295 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1972-04-26
Topic
general

VAUGHN, Judge. Though docketed more than three weeks late, we have, in our discretion, considered this appeal on its merits. All of defendant’s assignments of error have been carefully considered. In the trial from which the defendant appealed, we find no prejudicial error. No error.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Cruse. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

VAUGHN, Judge.

Though docketed more than three weeks late, we have, in our discretion, considered this appeal on its merits. All of defendant’s assignments of error have been carefully considered. In the trial from which the defendant appealed, we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Brock and Hedrick concur.