Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 138 N.C. App. 555 (2000)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 138 N.C. App. 555 (2000), 138 N.C. App. 555 (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
2000-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 138 N.C. App. 555 (2000)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 20 June 2000 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] STATE v. HOLLOWAY Durham Affirmed No. 99-1111 (97CRS32006) STATE v. HUNT Robeson Remanded for reentry No. 99-553 (96CRS09962) of judgment STATE v. JORDAN Guilford No Error No. 99-1169 (99CRS024748) STATE v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 138 N.C. App. 555 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS,138 N.C. App. 555(2000)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 20 June 2000


STATE v. HOLLOWAY Durham Affirmed No. 99-1111 (97CRS32006)

STATE v. HUNT Robeson Remanded for reentry No. 99-553 (96CRS09962) of judgment

STATE v. JORDAN Guilford No Error No. 99-1169 (99CRS024748)

STATE v. JOYNER Durham No Error No. 99-1171 (98CRS17331) (98CRS38158)

STATE v. KICKERY New Hanover No error in the trial; No. 99-702 (98CRS890) judgment vacated (98CRS893) and remanded for re-sentencing.

STATE v. LINDSAY Guilford No Error No. 99-921 (98CRS23685) (98CRS85852)

STATE v. MARLEY Forsyth No Error No. 99-539 (97CRS42761) (97CRS42763)

STATE v. MIDGETTE Pamlico Affirmed No. 99-694 (98CRS382) (98CRS383)

STATE v. MILLS Gaston Affirmed No. 99-1293 (95CRS33720) (95CRS33721) (95CRS33722)

STATE v. OVERTON Pasquotank No error; motion No. 99-532 (98CRS212) appropriate (98CRS1749) relief denied

STATE v. PARKER Hertford No Error No. 99-965 (97CRS2238) (97CRS2687) (97CRS3617)

STATE v. REID Cabarrus Affirmed No. 99-724 (98J105)

STATE v. SMITH Pitt No prejudicial error No. 99-870 (96CRS34136) (96CRS34137) (96CRS34138) (96CRS34139)Page 556
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩