Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 137 N.C. App. 384 (2000)
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 137 N.C. App. 384 (2000), 137 N.C. App. 384 (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2000-01-01
- Topic
- general
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 137 N.C. App. 384 (2000)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 4 April 2000 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 4 APRIL 2000 BAREFOOT v. THERMO Carteret Affirmed INDUS., INC. (97CVS106) No. 99-249 CLARK v. HOST MARRIOTT CORP.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 137 N.C. App. 384 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS,137 N.C. App. 384(2000)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 4 April 2000
FILED 4 APRIL 2000
BAREFOOT v. THERMO Carteret Affirmed INDUS., INC. (97CVS106) No. 99-249
CLARK v. HOST MARRIOTT CORP. Durham Affirmed No. 99-713 (98CVS00489)
COATS v. WALL Wake Vacated and No. 99-310 (95CVD9476) Remanded
IN RE BAILEY Buncombe Affirmed No. 99-582 (98J223)
IN RE BASS Durham Affirmed No. 99-1099 (95J75)
IN RE ESTATE OF HOLLAND Harnett Affirmed No. 99477 (98E535)
IN RE JARRETT Yadkin Affirmed No. 99-1078 (97J43) (97J44)
IN RE TAYLOR Richmond Affirmed No. 99-962 (97J140)
IN RE WILL OF STEWART Forsyth Appeal dismissed; No. 99-1024 (98E393) petition for writ of certiorari denied.
LEONHARDT v. CAROLINA Ind. Comm. Affirmed FREIGHT CARRIERS CORP. (455250) No. 99-855
McNEIL v. PUROLATOR Ind. Comm. Affirmed PRODUCTS CO. (638707) No. 99-845 (625217) (871825)
OFFERMAN v. OFFERMAN New Hanover Affirmed No. 99-458 (97CVD1333)
STATE v. ALLEN Cumberland No Error No. 99-1121 (96CRS54899)
STATE v. BARNES Cleveland No Error No. 99-1010 (98CRS13950)
STATE v. BLOUNT Beaufort No Error No. 99-529 (98CRS591)
STATE v. CAMPBELL Robeson No Error No. 99-934 (97CRS00897)Page 385
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩