Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

297 N.Y. 783

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1948-01-15
Topic
general

Motion by appellant for reargument denied. Motion by appellant to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court, viz. j whether section 124 of article 9 of the Traffic Regulations of the Police Commissioner of the City of New York is repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment or to section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the Traffic Regulation aforesaid is not repugnant to said provisions of the Constitution of the United States. [See 297 N. Y. 703.]

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

Motion by appellant for reargument denied.

Motion by appellant to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court, viz. j whether section 124 of article 9 of the Traffic Regulations of the Police Commissioner of the City of New York is repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment or to section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the Traffic Regulation aforesaid is not repugnant to said provisions of the Constitution of the United States. [See 297 N. Y. 703.]