Opinion · Nylaw New York

GUSTAVSON v. SOUTHERN BOULEVARD RAILROAD CO., LIPTON, 290 N.Y. 662 (1943)

HANNA GUSTAVSON, as Adm’r, Adm’x of the Est. of MARGARET GUSTAVSON,Deceased, Respondent & Appellant, v. S. BOULEVARD RAILROADCOMPANY, Respondent, & SELMA LIPTON, Defendant, Appellant & Respondent.(Action No. 1.)SELMA S. LIPTON, Appellant, v. S. BOULEVARD R.R. COMPANY,Respondent, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.), 290 N.Y. 662 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1943)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1943-03-04
Topic
general

GUSTAVSON v. SOUTHERN BOULEVARD RAILROAD CO., LIPTON, 290 N.Y. 662 (1943) HANNA GUSTAVSON, as Administratrix of the Estate of MARGARET GUSTAVSON,Deceased, Respondent and Appellant, v. SOUTHERN BOULEVARD RAILROADCOMPANY, Respondent, and SELMA LIPTON, Defendant, Appellant and Respondent.(Action No. 1.)SELMA S. LIPTON, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN BOULEVARD RAILROAD COMPANY,Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GUSTAVSON v. SOUTHERN BOULEVARD RAILROAD CO., LIPTON, 290 N.Y. 662 (1943). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GUSTAVSONv.SOUTHERN BOULEVARD RAILROAD CO., LIPTON,290 N.Y. 662(1943)
HANNA GUSTAVSON, as Administratrix of the Estate of MARGARET GUSTAVSON,
Deceased, Respondent and Appellant,v.SOUTHERN BOULEVARD RAILROAD
COMPANY, Respondent, and SELMA LIPTON, Defendant, Appellant and Respondent.
(Action No. 1.)
SELMA S. LIPTON, Appellant,v.SOUTHERN BOULEVARD RAILROAD COMPANY,
Respondent, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.)
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted February 23, 1943
Decided March 4, 1943
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, LOVE, J.
William G. Walshfor motion.Addison B. Scoville, Oliver R. BrantandAlfred T. Davison,opposed.
Motion dismissed on the ground that an appeal lies as of right.Page 663