Opinion · Nylaw New York

PERKINS v. THE BUFFALO, ROCHESTER PITTSBURGH R.R. CO., 125 N.Y. 776 (1891)

CHARLES H.B. PERKINS, Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., Respondent, v. BUFFALO,ROCHESTER & PITTSBURGH R.R. Co., Appellant., 125 N.Y. 776 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1891)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1891-01-01
Topic: general

PERKINS v. THE BUFFALO, ROCHESTER PITTSBURGH R.R. CO., 125 N.Y. 776 (1891) CHARLES H.B. PERKINS, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. THE BUFFALO,ROCHESTER AND PITTSBURGH RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 6, 1891 Decided February 24, 1891 Henry G.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PERKINS v. THE BUFFALO, ROCHESTER PITTSBURGH R.R. CO., 125 N.Y. 776 (1891). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PERKINSv. THE BUFFALO, ROCHESTER PITTSBURGH R.R. CO.,125 N.Y. 776(1891)

CHARLES H.B. PERKINS, Administrator, etc., Respondent,v. THE BUFFALO,

ROCHESTER AND PITTSBURGH RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 6, 1891

Decided February 24, 1891

Page 777

Henry G. Danforthfor appellant.M.E. E.M. Bartlettfor respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.