Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Ottenot v. . New York Lackawanna and Western Railway Co.

119 N.Y. 603

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1890-01-14
Topic
general

Earl, J., reads for reversal and new trial. Finch and Gbay, JJ., concur; Bugeb, Ch. J., Andbews and Peckham, JJ., concur in result on the ground that there is another remedy,? and because of the erroneous admission •of evidence as to damages. Judgment reversed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ottenot v. . New York Lackawanna and Western Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
Earl, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

Finch and Gbay, JJ., concur; Bugeb, Ch. J., Andbews and Peckham, JJ., concur in result on the ground that there is another remedy,? and because of the erroneous admission •of evidence as to damages.

Judgment reversed.