Opinion · North Dakota Supreme Court
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Tressler
N. Pac. R.R. v. Tressler, 2 N.D. 397 (N.D. 1892)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- North Dakota Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- North Dakota
- Date
- 1892-01-12
- Topic
- bankruptcy
The opinion of the court was delivered by Winchester, J. Following the case of Railroad Co. v. Barnes, ante (decided at this term), the judgment of the district court is reversed and a new trial ordered. McConnell, J., concurs. Corliss, C.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Northern Pacific Railroad v. Tressler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Winchester, J.Following the case of Railroad Co. v. Barnes, ante (decided at this term), the judgment of the district court is reversed and a new trial ordered.
McConnell, J., concurs. Corliss, C. J., dissents. Bartholomew and Wallin, JJ., having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of the above-entitled action, nor take any part in the opinion; Judge Winchester, of the sixth judicial district, and Judge McConnell, of the third judicial district,' sitting by request in their places.