Opinion · Wisconsin Supreme Court
Schafer v. Industrial Commission
Schafer v. Indus. Comm’n, 191 Wis. 186 (Wis. 1926)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Wisconsin Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Wisconsin
- Date
- 1926-10-12
- Topic
- general
Crownhart, J. Mr. Justice Stevens presided at the trial of this case in the circuit court. Pie therefore did not participate in the consideration and decision of the case in this court. The members of the court participating are equally divided in opinion upon the question involved on this appeal.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schafer v. Industrial Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Mr. Justice Stevens presided at the trial of this case in the circuit court. Pie therefore did not participate in the consideration and decision of the case in this court. The members of the court participating are equally divided in opinion upon the question involved on this appeal. Mr. Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Esch-weiler, and Mr. Justice Owen are of the opinion that the judgment appealed from should be reversed. Mr. Chief Justice Vinje, Mr. Justice Doerfler, and the writer are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Under the established rule it follows that the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad Comm. 189 Wis. 626, 208 N. W. 266.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.