Opinion · Nylaw New York

BAJUS v. SYRACUSE, BINGHAMTON AND NEW YORK RAILROAD CO., 119 N.Y. 651 (1890)

LOUIS BAJUS, Appellant, v. SYRACUSE, BINGHAMTON & NEW YORKRAILROAD Co., Respondent., 23 N.E. 1149 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1890)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1890-03-18
Topic: general

BAJUS v. SYRACUSE, BINGHAMTON AND NEW YORK RAILROAD CO., 119 N.Y. 651 (1890) 23 N.E. 1149 LOUIS BAJUS, Appellant, v. THE SYRACUSE, BINGHAMTON AND NEW YORKRAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 27, 1890 Decided March 18, 1890 W.R. Goodelle, for appellant. Louis Marshall for respondent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BAJUS v. SYRACUSE, BINGHAMTON AND NEW YORK RAILROAD CO., 119 N.Y. 651 (1890). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BAJUSv. SYRACUSE, BINGHAMTON AND NEW YORK RAILROAD CO.,119 N.Y. 651(1890)

23 N.E. 1149

LOUIS BAJUS, Appellant,v. THE SYRACUSE, BINGHAMTON AND NEW YORK

RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 27, 1890

Decided March 18, 1890

W.R. Goodelle,for appellant.Louis Marshallfor respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, excepting RUGER, Ch. J., not sitting, and ANDREWS, J., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.