Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF SEELEY v. PURCELL, 231 N.Y. 601 (1921)

In the Matter of Application of CHARLES P. SEELEY, as Sheriff of theCounty of Seneca, for a Writ of Mandamus, Appellant, against GEORGE T.PURCELL, as County Clerk of Said County, Respondent., 132 N.E. 904 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1921)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1921-06-10
Topic: general

MATTER OF SEELEY v. PURCELL, 231 N.Y. 601 (1921) 132 N.E. 904 In the Matter of the Application of CHARLES P. SEELEY, as Sheriff of theCounty of Seneca, for a Writ of Mandamus, Appellant, against GEORGE T.PURCELL, as County Clerk of Said County, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued June 7, 1921 Decided June 10, 1921 John M. Sutton for appellant. William S.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF SEELEY v. PURCELL, 231 N.Y. 601 (1921). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF SEELEYv. PURCELL,231 N.Y. 601(1921)

132 N.E. 904

In the Matter of the Application of CHARLES P. SEELEY, as Sheriff of the

County of Seneca, for a Writ of Mandamus, Appellant, against GEORGE T.

PURCELL, as County Clerk of Said County, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued June 7, 1921

Decided June 10, 1921

John M. Suttonfor appellant.William S. MacDonaldfor respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Absent: CRANE, J.