Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Legislative Conference of the City Univ. of New York v. Bd. of Higher Educ. of the City of New York

31 N.Y.2d 926

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1972-12-29
Topic
employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

Order affirmed, without costs. The offer of the Board as incorporated in the Appellate Division opinion appears to be a viable solution. Grievant would have one terminal year in the post of lecturer and the Board would be required to follow “ established procedures ’ ’ in re-evaluating the grievant. Thereupon, if grievant is found worthy of appointment to the faculty, benefits can be awarded to the grievant retroactively. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matter of Legislative Conference of the City Univ. of New York v. Bd. of Higher Educ. of the City of New York. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
29 opinions

Order affirmed, without costs. The offer of the Board as incorporated in the Appellate Division opinion appears to be a viable solution. Grievant would have one terminal year in the post of lecturer and the Board would be required to follow “ established procedures ’ ’ in re-evaluating the grievant. Thereupon, if grievant is found worthy of appointment to the faculty, benefits can be awarded to the grievant retroactively.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.